Peer Review Process

The research articles submitted to this online journal must undergo a rigorous peer-review process to ensure academic quality and relevance. Once a manuscript is received, it will first be assessed through an Initial Review conducted by the Editorial Board to evaluate its general suitability. This stage helps filter out submissions that do not meet the journal’s scope, ethical standards, or formatting guidelines. Articles that pass this preliminary check are forwarded to peer reviewers for further evaluation. During this stage, the Blind Review process is applied to maintain objectivity and eliminate potential bias. Reviewers will not know the identity of the authors, and vice versa, ensuring a fair and unbiased review outcome.

Following the blind review, the articles will be returned to the authors for revision based on the reviewers’ feedback. Authors are expected to make the necessary corrections and resubmit the improved manuscript within the given timeline. The entire review and revision process typically takes no longer than two months from the date of submission. Each manuscript is carefully assessed on both its academic substance and technical presentation, including clarity, originality, and methodological soundness. The journal collaborates with highly qualified peer reviewers who are experts in their respective fields and have in-depth knowledge of relevant issues. These reviewers bring valuable insights gained from years of experience in managing and publishing reputable journals at national and international levels.

About This Publishing System

This journal utilizes Open Journal Systems 3, an open-source journal management and publishing software developed, supported, and freely distributed by the Public Knowledge Project under the GNU General Public License.